<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Openings for Rootkit Analysts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rootkit.kaffenews.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=59" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rootkit.kaffenews.com/?p=59</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:41:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: affiliate program</title>
		<link>http://rootkit.kaffenews.com/?p=59&#038;cpage=1#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>affiliate program</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rootkit.kaffenews.com/?p=59#comment-397</guid>
		<description>I enjoy reading your posts. Thanks for all the hard work. I have learned much new things here. Thanks a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy reading your posts. Thanks for all the hard work. I have learned much new things here. Thanks a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nagareshwar Talekar</title>
		<link>http://rootkit.kaffenews.com/?p=59&#038;cpage=1#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Nagareshwar Talekar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rootkit.kaffenews.com/?p=59#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I guess it was marked as &#039;analysis&#039; (in yellow color) rather than suspicious as you have mentioned.  But if it is marked as suspicious (in brown color) then its error and we would like to know about it. 

Can you please confirm if it is marked as &#039;suspicious&#039; or &#039;analysis&#039; item. 

Currently there is no option for marking it otherwise. That will be great addition which may appear in upcoming releases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it was marked as &#8216;analysis&#8217; (in yellow color) rather than suspicious as you have mentioned.  But if it is marked as suspicious (in brown color) then its error and we would like to know about it. </p>
<p>Can you please confirm if it is marked as &#8217;suspicious&#8217; or &#8216;analysis&#8217; item. </p>
<p>Currently there is no option for marking it otherwise. That will be great addition which may appear in upcoming releases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Lepage</title>
		<link>http://rootkit.kaffenews.com/?p=59&#038;cpage=1#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Lepage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rootkit.kaffenews.com/?p=59#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Is there a place where we could rate .DLLs that SpyDllRemover shows as &quot;suspicious&quot; even though we really believe they are not dangerous? Ex: YBHook.dll seems to be part of an update of FlashPlayer. 
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a place where we could rate .DLLs that SpyDllRemover shows as &#8220;suspicious&#8221; even though we really believe they are not dangerous? Ex: YBHook.dll seems to be part of an update of FlashPlayer.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
